Large volumes of undisclosed man-made diamonds are believed to have entered the market after several hundred stones were sent to laboratories in Antwerp and Mumbai to be certified as natural diamonds.
· Mostly F to J Color, Clarity
VVS – VS. Internal characteristics were feathers,
pinpoints, small dark
crystals. The inclusions are strikingly similar to natural
inclusions, hence,
microscopic observation is insufficient to conclude.
· Sizes ranged from 0.30 ct to
0.70 ct.
· Polish, Symmetry and Cut were
either “Excellent” or “Very Good”.
· Bruted or faceted girdles.
· They were all type IIa and
were referred as such by DiamondSure.
· When tested using DiamondPlus
all the synthetics gave a “refer CVD” result.
· When viewed in DiamondView
they showed bluish green fluorescence and blue
phosphorescence, with
characteristic striations.
· The synthetics showed
moderately strong photoluminescence from H3 and
nitrogen-vacancy optical
centres (zero-phonon lines at 503 nm and 575/637 nm
respectively).
· They also exhibited
photoluminescence at 737 nm that is attributed to siliconvacancy
centres.
·
Absence of any laser inscription.
DCLA
CVD synthetic diamonds, diamonds triple treated to avoid detection and diamonds recut to match higher grade GIA reports being traded without disclosure. Kudos to IGI for detecting and exposing CVDs. We advise buyers to require “Natural Untreated Diamonds” be included on all invoices. Rapaport trade Alert!
DCLA receives on average one treated diamond per week for certification. These treatment range from Fracture filled, laser drilled all the way to irradiated and Synthetic stones. The origin of the diamond and the question, "Did the Jeweller or dealer knowingly submitted a treated diamond" is not always clear. Well after 11 years in Australia I would like to think not. but I would not bet on it.
ReplyDelete